disastrophe

How could he possibly get mad that I quoted something he actually said. Whether he said it is not up for debate. He did: there are records, there are journals, there are even crude recordings made on a player piano thing that mimics his voice saying "I fuck slaves." The argument, I would guess, stems from whether or not he actually was telling the truth when he said those things, or he was merely boasting to his slavefucker friends. The fact is, it was a diffffffferent time back then and I'll be damned if just about everyone wasn't fucking slaves. I'll go even further than that. I say that as long a person got sex in some form or fashion, that person had intimate conjugal relations with a human they owned. This discounts the obvious counterargument, "What about monks/priests/people with no cocks/&c." I will literally eat my hat if there existed someone who fucked humans, and didn't fuck slaves. That's all I'm trying to say. So since he had children, which is sufficient proof he had sex, he therefore fucked slaves; it's so little of a deal, it's not even a deal. You can literally not even get the words "it is a deal" out, your mouth just shuts down like it is made of silly putty or jam or somesuch. The fucking inherent nondealitude of the whole "fucked slaves" v. "didn't fuck slaves" is what strikes me as the more important issue. It really makes me sick.
XOXOXOXOXOOXOXOXOXOXOOXOXOXOXOXOXOOXOXOXOXOXOOXOXOX
ps